| 
View
 

DNA UM1 Profile

Page history last edited by searchinGirl 3 months, 3 weeks ago

 

DNA Evidence

 

 

 


Bode Lab Reports, 6-20-08 UM1 profile compared to findings on long underwear 

 

 

Proof of Intruder?

I think so.

   
 

This table data is directly and entirely from the CORA Files. In my opinion, it proves the existence of an Intruder. Bode Technology found this additional item of evidence that fit into Lou Smit's theory; it is significant. This the DNA STR profile of JonBenet Ramsey's killer, the Intruder. The profile has been entered into the Forensic Unknown database at CODIS, the identification of the Intruder. The UM1 profile is known as Unknown Male One, or UM1; it was discovered in two blood drops on JonBenet's panties. Also, it was discovered on the exterior waistband of JonBenet's white long underwear and is consistent with the UM1 profile in CODIS. Notice the long underwear profiles can all be explained by UM1.

 

    

Why we should doubt that? If you doubt the DNA in this case because you think the waistband samples are multiple people, then you have been misled. There are indications of additional people as noted with the observations of 18 and 6 as can be seen in the Table (more than 4 alleles at a given locus). UM1 dominates the sample and Bode Labs called it consistent.

 

The touch DNA from the long underwear was given a random match probability of 1:6200 in the U.S. Caucasian Population of unrelated individuals. A quantification of probabilistic genetic relation. It can be interpreted to mean the longJohn and panties profiles are way more likely to be related, than are the longJohns profile and a false positive match.  

 

 
 
 
Bode Lab Report June 20, 2008
CODIS NDIS Fact Sheet
 
About the UM1 Profile:    
  There are 9 markers that show both alleles, 13 show one allele at each marker. I’m no expert but DNA is evaluated in pairs shown at each location of the double helix. With the UM1 profile there are 3 markers that show a + beside them; I believe this means these markers are possibly homozygous but the peaks were not high enough to conclude that. In other words, the second marker has a higher probability of being the same as the first. I can’t speak to the decision to submit this to CODIS but when it was, it was run twice, the second included the + markers as being homozygous. That leaves only 1 marker with 1 allele, TPOX, with the 2nd marker unknown. I believe with only one allele missing, it is a true Partial Profile in terms of CODIS and can be used to search for and return a close relative, or Partial Match, from the database. CODIS NDIS Fact Sheet  I am no expert but, I have deduced my reasoning from the information at the link.

  

 
 

I google the question, "does DNA profile with multiple homozygous markers indicate incest"? and got this AI response:

 

 
 
 

Yes, a DNA profile showing high levels of homozygous markers (where both alleles at a locus are identical) can be a strong indicator of incest, as it suggests the parents share a recent common ancestor. Specifically, significant "runs of homozygosity" or high (>40%) levels of homozygosity indicate that parents are likely first-degree relatives. (Frontiers Frontiers +3) Evidence of Incest: Children born to closely related parents (e.g., parent-child or siblings) inherit very similar chromosomes, resulting in large, numerous, and long stretches of homozygous DNA. What it Measures: While typical DNA tests look at a few dozen markers, detecting incest requires looking at broader genome-wide homozygosity, where roughly 1/4 of the genome is homozygous, often indicating first-degree relative mating. Alternative Causes: While often pointing to incest, levels of homozygosity can also be found in children from endogamous populations (endogamy) or from parents who are first cousins or otherwise closely related, though not necessarily first-degree relatives. Definitive Diagnosis: The only way to confirm incest is to compare the child's DNA profile with that of the alleged parents. The Wire Science The Wire Science +2 If a child's DNA shows unexpectedly high levels of homozygosity, it is highly suggestive of a, potentially, consensual or forced, close familial relationship between the parents. National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)

 

Wow! That's very interesting.

  
 
     

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.